Sunday, December 20, 2009

AN EDUCATION POLICY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THE MALAYS REMAIN STUPID SO THEY CAN BE CONTROLLED AND MANIPULATED BY THE MALAY ELITE ( THE FEUDAL LORDS -UMNOPUTRAS )

BUT WHAT IS REALLY SAD IS THAT THE MALAYS THEMSELVES BELIEVE IN THIS HENCE THERE IS NO WAY THIS WILL EVER CHANGE !!!!! YOU CAN TAKE THE DONKEY TO THE WATER BUT YOU CANT FORCE IT TO DRINK UNLESS IT WANTS TO , RIGHT ? REAL SAD ! REAL SAD !



The First Bungle of the 1st 100 days in office !

Jaga Bahasa Biar Jahanam Bangsa !


By Syed Akbar Ali


In one of my Four Wheel Drive trips into the jungle some years ago, we stopped at a place called Cheneh in Terengganu. I remember a makcik at a roadside stall made some nice ayam goreng. My good friend Juhaidi was with me and also my two boys.

Cheneh was (and maybe still is) a typical rural backwater. The folks did not seem to know if they were coming or they
were going... There was Astro but I think the favorite show was 'Tom Tom Bak'. But I did recall saying aloud that someday I hope that the folks in Cheneh would watch CNN, BBC and CBS and that we could just drive up and ask the makcik in Cheneh 'Whats on CNN today?' But I think that's not going to happen at all.

Tuan Tuan dan Puan Puan, our Prime Minister Dato Najib has made his first bungle - and within the first 100 days too..... No Sirs, it is a major bungle. You have bungled big time.

Lets manage this "crisis in the making" now. First of all please stop from saying anything more about the switch
from English to Malay. The more things you say, the more "face saving" devices you will need for you to swallow your pride before you can undo this mistake. But this mistake must be undone.

I just happened to be with Tun Dr Mahathir Mohammad yesterday Thursday July 9th 09 slightly after noon when the
news came in that the Cabinet had decided to flip flop over the language issue.

Firstly Tun Dr Mahathir raised a simple but valid point. The main reason quoted by Tan Sri Muhyuddin to favor the switch to Malay was that the rural Malay kids were doing
poorly in Maths and Science (which are taught in English) compared to the urban kids. But what about exam scores for the rural kids in all other subjects which are taught in the Malay language?

Dr Mahathir said no one showed him the statistics for that. Why?

If you say that English is the reason why the rural kids are doing so poorly in Maths and Science, then by your logic the rural kids should be scoring the same as or better than the urban kids in other subjects that are taught in Malay? By your logic rural kids should be doing better than the urban kids in Sejarah, Geografi, Kemahiran Hidup, Bahasa Malaysia and other Malay language subjects.

But we know that rural kids generally score lower than urban kids in most subjects (except maybe Agama). And language has got nothing to do with it. Rural kids are usually found in lower income households, their parents are usually less educated, they have less achievement goals and so forth.

That is why you call them 'children from rural areas'. They are poor people and they are underachievers.

So this comparison with rural kids and urban k
ids is not fully accurate (Tun Dr Mahathir used another word which I need not repeat here).

Let me give you some street feedback. At
least one Internet based employment agency has instructions from its clients to completely ignore any job applicants who are graduates from UTM (University ITM). As we know UITM graduates are all Malays. They say the quality of the graduates is low and their English is bad..

They are unemployable. This is what I heard. Another preference by another employer - a Multi National Corporation - in the job market is to take in job applicants who are graduates of IPTA (private universities) who have done

twinning programs. This means their English is good and they are more marketable. Again

this means Malays with poor English skills are not preferred. Bottom of the line.

And here is some news from Cyberjaya. We opened up Cyberjaya and gave foreign'Call Centers' in Cyberjaya take in Indians as a first choice for employment. They feel that generally Indians speak better English... Second choice are Chinese. Finally they will look at Malays as the last choice but rarely. investors much benefits and incentives to open business there.. Among the foreign investments in Cyberjaya are 'Call Centers'.. Well some

Even with the emphasis on English the past six years, the Malays cannot speak enough English to get a job answering telephones in Call Centers in Cyberjaya. THIS IS PATHETIC !!!!!!!

We cannot shut them down or arrest them under the ISA for practising such discrimination. They come here for business. We must provide them the tools necessary to run their businesses well. We are not doing the job.


To Dato Najib and Tan Sri Muhyuddin Yassin, why are you doing this? Who agreeswith you? Who are you afraid of?
Takkan UMNO Johor is so powerful to frighten Muhyuddin?

Last nite I met a Deputy Minister and a well
known "ultra Malay" ex-newspaper editor. The Deputy Minister said it was a bad decision to switch back to Malay. The 'ultra Malay' ex-editor was visibly upset and said "I have no comments. I don't want to say anything." I think he did not agree with

the switch at all.


Another well known "ultra-ultra" Malay defender of all things Malay (if I just mention his job you will know who he is) said the switch to Malay was

'satu langkah ke belakang'.

A Tan Sri from Kelantan said in English "this is a giant leap backward for the

Malays"...

In the present world, the English language is a 'life giving' language. The amount of

new knowledge and new information that comes out in the English language is astounding. No one can

translate all the new knowledge and information that comes out in English EACH and EVERY DAY. It is impossible.. We have to master this language. There is no other way.

Then we have the 'tidak masuk akal' ideas. Tan Sri Muhyuddin says after the switch back to Malay, he still wants to upgrade the teaching of English in the rural schools. He wants to employ about 1000 native English speakers to teach English in rural schools. By native speaker I do not know if he is referring to Mrs Naidu from Brickfields or if he wants to employ real Mat Sallehs from outside the country.

Mrs Naidu the retired English teacher will gladly teach English to our children for RM3000 per month. But we will have to pay the Mat Sallehs RM15,000 a month or more before they will come to work here.

But if that is a good idea then why not employ 1000 Mat Sallehs at RM15000 a month to teach Maths and Science in English in the rural schools?

Because according to Tan Sri Muhyuddin, it is not the school children in the rural schools who are to be faulted.

The real culprits are the teachers. Muhyuddin let the cat out of the bag.
Here is what Muhyuddin said (from the Press):

"It was based on empirical studies and other specialist reviews," he said. Based on studies conducted in 2008, he said, the ministry found that only a small percentage of teachers fully used English to teach the two subjects.


"On average, the percentage of those using English during Mathematics and Science periods was around 53% to 58%," he said, adding that only a small number of teachers were proficient. Muhyiddin said studies carried out by local universities found that students' mastery level of English during the entire policy was around 3% while the level among rural students was low."

So don't push the blame on the rural students lah , Syewel !

It is the teachers who were malas to teach in English. And there are other reasons why some Malay teachers do not use English. Among them are religious reasons because some people believe that speaking English may lead to you 'jadi kristian'. FULAWEI ! ADA BODOH MACAM INI PUN DLM KALANGAN GURU KITA KAH ?

Even in the towns (including Kuala Lumpur ) it is also
considered "showing off" if Malay people speak English.
So there are other quite illogical reasons why Malay teachers are shy to speak and teach in English. Don't just
blame it (and quite wrongly too) on the rural school
children. That is not correct....

And even if what Tan Sri Muhyuddin is saying is indeed
true, why burden the urban kids and dim their chances at a better future just because the rural kids are having problems with English?

Urban kids are usually the children of parents who are
more educated, who work in offices, run businesses and
generally earn a higher income and enjoy a better standard of
living. The rural folks are usually much poorer than the urban folks..

That is why we have to make sure that the rural folks get
the same or better opportunities to get out of the
poverty cycle and move up in life so that they too can enjoy a
standard of living like the urban people.. A good
education
and the ability to converse in English is definitely one way up.

But what this policy reversal has done is to lower the entire national average. Instead of moving the rural people up the ladder, we are now moving moving the urban folks down to the level of the rural people. We are lowering the averages. Hang tak payah jadi pandai macam aku, biar aku jadi bodoh macam hang !

We are nailing the Malays inside the language cocoon. We
are also creating a "non English understanding rural poor" versus an "English speaking urban elite" divide.
The Malays who cannot speak English will be left further and further behind.

BUT YOU THINK UMNO CARES FOR YOU ????

The English speaking urban folks (Malays, Chinese and
Indians) will move light years ahead of the non English
speaking folks. There will most definitely be an English
speaking elite in the country. More problems will arise....

Then we have also allowed International Schools in the
country to be opened to all Malaysians. We also have
foreign universities like Nottingham and Monash. We are basically denying many Malays from qualifying to enter these universities and international schools. They can go to UITM and become more 'cocoon infested' and unemployable.

But very, very few kids make it to university or college in the first place. Only 2% to 3% of the population goes to
university anyway. The large bulk of our young kids will
become school leavers (SPM or PMR) with no employable skills, no knowledge of "life giving" English. Their future is doomed.

Akhir sekali saya nampak peluang hidup bagi budak Melayu dari kampong menjadi lagi tipis. Siapa yang ada tanah getah, mungkin akan kerja potong getah saja di kampong.

Kalau tak ada tanah getah, depa akan hijrah Bandar dan pekan untuk mencari kerja sebagai office boy, messenger dan peon.... TERIMA KASIH AJELAH KEPADA GOMEN


They may even think that office boy, messenger and peon are three different careers.

15 comments:

  1. The Malays, NGOs pushed the UMNO and BN to go backward, are u implying that changing the perlembagaan backward too... reform the borderless world into cocoon

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear J4OTK

    Liow, are you in MCA or Umno?

    Joshua Teng
    Sunday, 20 December 2009 15:59

    POSERS FOR LIOW Liow Tiong Lai must be “congratulated” for coming to the rescue of Education Minister Muyhiddin Yassin recently with regards to the issue that only 10 subjects would be considered for Public Service Department (PSD) scholarship.

    In championing the cause of his fellow Cabinet member or shall I put it his Umno boss, the MCA vice-president told a press conference that the government had never rejected Literature, Chinese or Tamil to be included as part of the SPM results as claimed by certain quarters.

    liow tiong lai 2.jpgHe explained that Muyhiddin announced recently that students sitting for the SPM examination could take two additional subjects, but only 10 would be considered for PSD scholarships.

    Such clarification coming from the Health Minister leaves more questions unanswered than anything else.

    Why be Muhyiddin's spokesman?

    Firstly, why does Liow needs to act as a spokesman for Muyhiddin. Secondly Liow seems to be very accommodating and ever ready to clarify matters pertaining to education irrespective if it means compromising on the interest of the Chinese.

    If I may ask Liow whether by defending Muyhiddin, is he saying that it is alright that Chinese or Tamil subjects be excluded for scholarship consideration if students were to take more than 10 subjects.

    In short, is he saying that it does not matter that these two subjects, the mother tongue of two communities in multi-faceted Malaysia, is not important to be used as a yardstick to decide whether scholarships should be given.

    If this is the case, I must say that Liow deserves the accolade for helping to diminish the rights of the two communities.

    Liow also told reporters that he had the responsibility to clarify the matter to the public to avoid confusion.

    muhyiddin-yassin 2.jpgWhat responsibility?. I am confused whether he is a spokesman for MCA or Umno? But I think the confusion here points to Liow’s eagerness in clarifying the matter instead of pushing for the two subjects to be counted among the 10 subjects for scholarship consideration in the event students were to take an additional two subjects.

    Surely, Liow would know that it would not be in the best interest for the two communities if the two subjects were dropped.

    Part 2 to follow
    MCA Watcher

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear J4OTK

    Part 2


    Sulking up to his Umno boss is one thing but to ignore the fact that the two subjects were excluded as a requisite for scholarships is one big shame on the part of Liow.

    Not one language should take precedent

    If Bahasa Malaysia can be among the 10 core subjects for scholarship awards, why the Chinese and Tamil subjects cannot be similarly accorded such qualifying status.

    No one language of the three major races in the country should take precedent over the other, especially so when we are now talking about 1Malaysia.

    Liow must be reminded that as an elected representative of the people, he is expected to speak up and not help sweep things under the carpet.

    Politicians must be mindful and be humble to the fact that the power lies with the people. It is the people who will ultimately define who stays in power and what the government stands for.

    But sad to say that MCA has also another “tua kor tai”. Deputy Education Minister Dr Wee Ka Siong was quoted as saying at the Parliament lobby that the Tamil and Chinese languages and literature subjects were never included for consideration in scholarship awards in the past.

    Dr Wee, it does not mean that if those subjects were not included in the past, he as the deputy minister as well as MCA Youth Chief cannot do anything about it.

    I remember Youth leaders of the MCA who were elected previously were fiery leaders who are also fearless in bringing up issues. Where are such leaders now?

    najib.jpgOn the contrary, I must say kudos to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak who at a function recently spoke on the need for Malaysians, especially Malays to learn Mandarin.

    Speaking at the 90th anniversary celebrations of the Chong Hwa Independent High School, Najib said that the language was one of the country’s many assets and that the language was an important lingo as China had become a world economic superpower.

    Well said, Mr Prime Minister

    He further said : “When we learn the languages of other races, we learn more about each other. Only when we respect and honour one another, can we become true Malaysians who support the 1Malaysia concept.”

    Words well said from a true leader and top statesman in the country which leaves much to be desired for the statement made by Liow and Wee.

    If leaders like Najib can see an issue in the wholesome perspective and the real need of such a language, I don’t understand why Liow and Wee cannot see the importance of giving due recognition to it.

    Both the MCA leaders should realign their thoughts to be in line with the 1Malaysia concept as propagated by Najib where the people comes first and immediate performance are expected.

    Just like the prime minister, Liow and Wee should be able to see the larger picture of things, beyond the political cocoon of the Barisan Nasional, which was founded on the premise of working together to serve the people at large, irrespective of race or creed.

    Both the leaders should actually question why Chinese and Tamil subjects be “sidelined” when we are now talking about 1Malaysia and equality for all races.

    One also wonders if Liow is the vice-president for MCA or Umno. He owes the Chinese community an explanation on his stand.

    MCA Watcher

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nobody owes Chinese anything. And in fact, Chinese owes everybody everything !

    ReplyDelete
  5. MCA Watcher

    You are being attacked by the alien virus. Just ignore it.

    This virus is spineless and it permeates everywhere.

    Chinese says POURING COLD WATER. He can only construct one or two incoherent sentences.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The destructive virus is known as the MCA virus.

    Because of this MCA virus, the Chinese in this nation faces tremendous hardship and constant heartaches.

    Because of this MCA virus, every day the Chinese are being reminded that they are "Pendatang".

    Get rid of this MCA virus and the Chinese have a chance to be an equal partner in this nation.

    With this MCA virus around, the Chinese will continue to be oppressed by arm no.

    This MCA virus has outlived its expiry date. Kil it now !

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anon 7:10

    take the pendatang and shaft it up your ass .

    Anwar Ibrahim when he was DPM in 1998 asked the Chinese to balek Tiong San . Zulklifi Noordin asked the Chinese to balek China .

    Hang Tuah is a Chinese . hahaha blek mana ?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey J4OTK. Why dont MCA leave BN? Since MCA is useless in adressing this important issue in BN and the Govt.

    ReplyDelete
  9. they want to win the putrajaya badly, they can't win it unless MCA out of BN, now I know how strong MCA are to their winning inings

    ReplyDelete
  10. I too found out that this virus has no substance. Picking out one or two points and to for the kill.

    I'll try to fish more information from him. He is quite naive exposing his weaknesses.

    Horay.....

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Death to a Nation: The death knell has just rung for Malaysia when its leaders announced the decision on July 8, 2009 to revert to the Malay language (BM) in the teaching and learning of Science and Mathematics in national schools. It has changd the policy of the previous government that favoured the use of English for Maths and Science that began in 2003. The new policy is seen as a retrogressive step in light of globalisation and the fact that the English is the language of knowledge and progress/development well known and accepted by everyone. It has also seen as a lack of foresight on the part of our leaders to see the future of Malaysia as a progressive nation. Like what people said, where there is no vision or political leadership the country/people suffer. This leads to national backwardness and ruins.

    Everyone knows that English is a language of knowledge and progress as it is used widely in every nation of the globe. With English people are able to crreate/innovate and that is why we have all kinds of technologies involving science and mathematics ranging from computer services and products to hand phones and communication systems and to household products and equipment. This is all due to scientific progress in engineering and its processes and the results of using English as a tool to invent thngs. The English language is not only adaptable and flexible in its usage `but` is willing to take in foreign words from other countries such as the words 'satay' and 'sarung', etc., and treat them as its own. It therefore has a universal appeal than other languages even though originally it absorbed only foreign elements from Greek and Latin. It is also used in law, administration and external affairs in many countries such as India, Singapore and Hongkong` as it is so bound up with history and tradition. It is a language extensvely used in the media and the Internet web-sites throughout the world. It is wondered why the Malaysan government chose to set back the tide of progress in rejecting the use of English for maths and science only after six years of implementation is beyond comprehension. There may be some hidden agendas behind the decision.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Death to a Nation (continue)

    In changing back to BM for science and mathematics after a short spell of six years, the government has offered a number of reasons,which to many, are not tenable at all. First, the government says that the use of English in mathematics and science has a negative effect on students' results in the subjects. It says there was a slight drop in the UPSR science results in urban/rural schools from 85% to 82% (U)/84-81% (R) and maths 83 to 80% (U)/81-77% (R)and saw these figures as a drawback to the nation. Coupled with that there was only a slight improvement in the use of English in local universities and that over 40% of the teachers are not interested in using the language including the fact that they are not proficient enough. All these kinds of reasonings are very flimsy and downright absurb. It also underlines the percentage drop of students' results in rural schools to urban schools but without taking into consideration the abundant facilities available in town schools. So in their view it is better to teach pupils in the Malay language, the mother tongue of Malaysia, as they think it is easier for pupils to learn and understand. Is this making sense to you or nonsense? While researrch may show that it is easier to learn a subject in the mother tongue (for e.g Malay) but why allow Mandarin (the official language of China) to teach science and maths to Malaysian chinese students in Chinese schools and for that matter Tamil (Indian language) in Tamil schools. Are there one or three mother tongues in Malaysia? What about other races such as Iban/Kadazan, etc! Though laudable, we should be consistent when it comes to prnciples. We should not place politics above the interest/progress of the nation at the expense of the vast majority of the Malays/Chinese/Indians, who would like to see English used as the medium of instruction for the two subjects because it is for the progress and development of this nation. Educators and intellectuals who suported the use of Malay in science and maths are completely bias in their approach/views either beccause they are on the payrolls of the government or they are politicians supporting sectional interests of the community whether Malays/Chinese/Indians or just toeing the line.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Death to a Nation (continue)

    Perhaps the biggest reason for the change is due to Gapena, a group/association of Malay writers, who campaigned heavily and demonstrated against the use of English in Science and Mathematics just before the present government took over in April of 2009. The then government led by Abdullah Badlwi was pretty adamant about the change. The change in using Malay may be seen to be helping to bolster a very much weakened government after the March 8, 2008 general election when the ruling government lost many states to the Opposition Front.

    Whatever the reasons are for the change it is going to affect many students, particularly the Chinese, if they fail to secure a place in the local universities for their studies, they would not be able to go overseas to fulfil their ambitions because they are poor in English. Wthout a good command in English businessmen will ot be able to do business or compete effectively in the global markets. Our universities will only be satisfied with low-level research or somethng basic or non innovative and thee will be no drive for commercial research to compete with the best or the cream/elite of those who are good in science and maths.

    Our leaders need to grow and mature and to think like a globalist with internationalist aspiration. The decision to stop using English for Maths and Science has a lot of implications. It presupposes our leaders lack wisdom or like to play the race card, deprive the rights of other races in terms of wealth distribution, university seats allocation, freedom of expression/democracy and other injustces, etc. We need to rise above petty sectional/community politics and overcome our bad attitudes or habits of self interest/selfishness and love our nation better than ourselves if we want progress for the good of all. Will that time ever come? If not, the death bell will toll forever.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think the govn is to stupid or too lenient in dealing with religion and race issues in this country.

    true blood

    ReplyDelete

All slanderous comments will be deleted .Comments that include personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as spamming and trolling; will be removed. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.