Showing posts with label Utusan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Utusan. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Chinese Malaysians Asking Far Too Much

Chinese Malaysians Asking Far Too Much ???

TC Replies to the article "Orang Cina Malaysia , apa lagi yang anda mahu?"

By Zaini Hassan
Source - Straits Times, published Apr 30, 2010

WHAT else do Chinese Malaysians want? Let us put aside the reasons why they do not support the current government in Kuala Lumpur . Let us study first what else they want.


For that, we have to go back to history. The Chinese came to Malaya to seek opportunities. They had lived a hard life in mainland China for hundreds of years. Like the whites who migrated to the American continent because it was the land of opportunity, the Chinese migrated to Malaya to make their fortunes in this bountiful land.

The strategy of their forebears has borne fruit. The Chinese have attained what they wanted. They now live in the lap of luxury in this land of opportunity called Malaysia .

In fact, it is not only in Malaysia that they have attained what they wanted. They have even gained full control of Singapore . Singapore is not their original country. The Singapore Chinese and the Malaysian Chinese were originally boat people. The difference is that those who landed in Singapore managed to gain full control of Singapore , but those who landed in Malaysia did not manage to control Malaysia .


In Malaysia , the Chinese live in peace with the Malays, the indigenous people and the Indians. In comparison, in Singapore , the Chinese control politics and the Government. In Malaysia , the Malays still control politics and the government. The systems of both governments are the same, but it is vice versa: The Malays dominate in Malaysia while the Chinese dominate across the Causeway.


In contrast, the Malays in Singapore and the Chinese in Malaysia are very different. The Malays in Singapore lead ordinary lives while the Chinese in Malaysia lead lives that are 'more than ordinary'.

In fact, former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad once stated that if all the Chinese-owned buildings in Kuala Lumpur were lifted from the map, only the buildings in Kampung Baru, a Malay area, would remain in the city.
All the other buildings are owned by Chinese Malaysians. The well-known shopping centres in Malaysia are owned by the Chinese.
The Chinese Malaysians are fantastic. They control all the cities and major towns in peninsular Malaysia , as well as Sabah and Sarawak . They produce the largest number of, and the most successful, professionals. The school system of the Chinese Malaysians is the best among similar school systems in the world.
The Chinese account for most of the students studying in the best private colleges in Malaysia . The Malays can gain admission into only government-owned colleges of ordinary reputation.
With regard to corporate and private organisations, it is the Chinese who dominate. The Malays number just a few; most of them are low-level employees. In fact, knowing Mandarin is a prerequisite for applying for jobs in these organisations.
Finally, an annual survey by the Malaysian Business magazine has found that eight of the 10 richest people in Malaysia are Chinese. The following is the list of the 10 richest people in Malaysia :

Mr Robert Kuok Hock Nien
Mr Tatparanandam Ananda Krishnan
Tan Sri Lee Shin Cheng
Tan Sri Teh Hong Piow
Tan Sri Lim Kok Thay

Tan Sri Quek Leng Chan
Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary
Puan Sri Lee Kim Hua
Tan Sri Tiong Hiew King
Tan Sri Vincent Tan Chee Yioun


This is the reality in Malaysia , my beloved country. Is the current government, which has been in power for 52 years, cruel and totalitarian? What else do the Chinese Malaysians want? I think I know, and I think you know too.


Date: Sunday, 2 May, 2010, 10:16 PM



Here is Thuan Chye's response to Utusan Malaysia 's article

Source: www.freemalaysiatoday.com

Thuan Chye Responds to "Orang Cina Malaysia , apa lagi yang anda mahu?"(Utusan Malaysia article)


By Kee Thuan Chye

Every time the Barisan Nasional gets less than the expected support from Chinese voters at an election, the question invariably pops up among the petty-minded: Why are the Chinese ungrateful?

So now, after the Hulu Selangor by-election, it's not surprising to read in Utusan Malaysia a piece that asks: "Orang Cina Malaysia , apa lagi yang anda mahu?" (trans. Chinese of Malaysia, what more do you want?)
Normally, something intentionally provocative and propagandistic as this doesn't deserve to be honoured with a reply. But even though I'm fed up with such disruptive and ethnocentric polemics, this time I feel obliged to reply - partly because the article has also been published, in an English translation, in the Straits Times of Singapore.
I wish to emphasise here that I am replying not as a Chinese Malaysian but, simply, as a Malaysian. Let me say at the outset that the Chinese have got nothing more than what any citizen should get. So to ask "what more" it is they want, is misguided. A correct question would be, "What do the Chinese want?"

All our lives, we Chinese have held to the belief that no one owes us a living. We have to work for it. Most of us have got where we are by the sweat of our brow, not by handouts or the policies of the government.
We have come to expect nothing - not awards, not accolades, not gifts from official sources. (Let's not lump in Datukships, that's a different ball game.) We know that no Chinese who writes in the Chinese language will ever be bestowed the title of Sasterawan Negara, unlike in Singapore where the literatures of all the main language streams are recognised and honoured with the Cultural Medallion, etc.

We have learned we can't expect the government to grant us scholarships. Some will get those, but countless others won't. We've learned to live with that and to work extra hard in order to support our children to attain higher education - because education is very important to us. We experience a lot of daily pressure to achieve that. Unfortunately, not many non-Chinese realise or understand that. In fact, many Chinese had no choice but to emigrate for the sake of their children's further education. Or to accept scholarships from abroad, many from Singapore , which has inevitably led to a brain drain.

The writer of the Utusan article says the Chinese "account for most of the students" enrolled in "the best private colleges in Malaysia ". Even so, the Chinese still have to pay a lot of money to have their children study in these colleges. And to earn that money, the parents have to work very hard. The money does not fall from the sky.
The writer goes on to add: "The Malays can gain admission into only government-owned colleges of ordinary reputation." That is utter nonsense. Some of these colleges are meant for the cream of the Malay crop of students and are endowed with the best facilities. They are given elite treatment.
The writer also fails to acknowledge that the Chinese are barred from being admitted to some of these colleges. As a result, the Chinese are forced to pay more money to go to private colleges. Furthermore, the Malays are also welcome to enrol in the private colleges, and many of them do. It's, after all, a free enterprise.

Plain and simple reason
The writer claims that the Chinese live "in the lap of luxury" and lead lives that are "more than ordinary" whereas the Malays in Singapore , their minority-race counterparts there, lead "ordinary lives". Such sweeping statements sound inane especially when they are not backed up by definitions of "lap of luxury" and "ordinary lives". They sound hysterical, if not hilarious as well, when they are not backed up by evidence. It's surprising that a national daily like Utusan Malaysia would publish something as idiosyncratic as that. And the Straits Times too.
The writer quotes from a survey that said eight of the 10 richest people in Malaysia are Chinese. Well, if these people are where they are, it must have also come from hard work and prudent business sense. Is that something to be faulted?

If the writer had said that some of them achieved greater wealth through being given crony privileges and lucrative contracts by the government, there might be a point, but even then, it would still take hard work and business acumen to secure success. Certainly, Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary, who is one of the 10, would take exception if it were said that he has not worked hard and lacks business savvy.
Most important, it should be noted that the eight Chinese tycoons mentioned in the survey represent but a minuscule percentage of the wider Chinese Malaysian population. To extrapolate that because eight Chinese are filthy rich, the rest of the Chinese must therefore live in the lap of luxury and lead more than ordinary lives would be a mockery of the truth. The writer has obviously not met the vast numbers of very poor Chinese.

The crux of the writer's article is that the Chinese are not grateful to the government by not voting for Barisan Nasional at the Hulu Selangor by-election. But this demonstrates the thinking of either a simple mind or a closed one.
Why did the Chinese by and large not vote for BN? Because it's corrupt. Plain and simple. Let's call a spade a spade. And BN showed how corrupt it was during the campaign by throwing bribes to the electorate, including baiting a Chinese school in Rasa by promising RM3 million should it win the by-election.
The Chinese were not alone in seeing this corruption. The figures are unofficial but one could assume that at least 40 per cent of Malays and 45 per cent of Indians who voted against BN in that by-election also had their eyes open. So, what's wrong with not supporting a government that is corrupt? If the government is corrupt, do we continue to support it?
To answer the question then, what do the Chinese want?
They want a government...

a. that is not corrupt;

b. that can govern well and proves to have done so;

c. that tells the truth rather than lies;

d. that follows the rule of law;

e. that upholds rather than abuses the country's sacred institutions.

Because BN does not fit that description, the Chinese have learned not to vote for it. This is not what only the Chinese want. It is something every sensible Malaysian, regardless of race, wants. Is that something that is too difficult to understand?
Some people think that the government is to be equated with the country, and therefore if someone does not support the government, they are being disloyal to the country. This is a complete fallacy. BN is not Malaysia . It is merely a political coalition that is the government of the day. Rejecting BN is not rejecting the country.

A sense of belonging
Let's be clear about this important distinction. In America , the people sometimes vote for the Democrats and sometimes for the Republicans. Voting against the one that is in government at the time is not considered disloyalty to the country.
By the same token, voting against UMNO is also voting against a party, not against a race. And if the Chinese or whoever criticise UMNO, they are criticising the party; they are not criticising Malays. It just happens that UMNO's leaders are Malay.
It is time all Malaysians realised this so that we can once and for all dispel the confusion. Let us no longer confuse country with government. We can love our country and at the same time hate the government. It is perfectly all right.

I should add here what the Chinese don't want:

a. We don't want to be insulted,

b. We don't want to be called pendatang

c. We don't want to be told to be grateful for our citizenship.

We have been loyal citizens; we duly and dutifully pay taxes; we respect the country's constitution and its institutions. Our forefathers came to this country many generations ago and helped it to prosper. We are continuing to contribute to the country's growth and development.

Would anyone like to be disparaged, made to feel unwelcome or unwanted? For the benefit of the writer of the Utusan article, what MCA president Chua Soi Lek means when he says the MCA needs to be more vocal is that it needs to speak up whenever the Chinese community is disparaged. For too long, the MCA has not spoken up strongly enough when UMNO politicians and associates like Ahmad Ismail, Nasir Safar, Ahmad Noh and others before them insulted the Chinese and made them feel like they don't belong. That's why the Chinese have largely rejected the MCA.
You see, the Chinese, like all human beings, want self-respect. And a sense of belonging in this country they call home. That is all the Chinese want, and have always wanted. Nothing more.

The Utusan Malaysia article: Orang Cina Malaysia , apa lagi yang anda mahu?

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Nik Aziz's I’m proud to be Muslim not Malay roils Utusan,Perkasa.

Nik Aziz
KOTA BHARU (Harakahdaily) - PAS Murshidul Am Tuan Guru Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat’s statement that he was proud to be a Muslim but not a Malay has drawn reactions from the usual group of people, namely Perkasa and its mouthpiece, Utusan Malaysia.

The Malay daily, known for its extensive coverage dedicated to the issue of Malay dominance, suggested that the Kelantan Menteri Besar had forsaken the fight for Malays.

"While there are efforts to eliminate special rights of Malays, Menteri Besar Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat said he was not proud of being a Malay," said the staunchly right-wing UMNO-owned Mingguan Malaysia, Utusan's weekend edition.

Its political cartoon column, Senyum Kambing, also took issue with Nik Aziz's statement.

For his part, Perkasa chief Ibrahim Ali said he was not surprised with Nik Aziz’s statement, saying the latter had revealed his true identity as someone who used religion to attract non-Malay voters.

At a dialogue-cum-Hari Raya gathering with journalists recently, Nik Aziz said a Muslim's Islamic identity was more important than his race.

“I am not proud to be Malay. Race comes automatically and in Islam there is no longer (the issue of) race,” he was quoted as saying.

He said the Kelantan state government had spent RM7 million to build a mosque based on Chinese architecture in Rantau Panjang in its effort to rid the problem of racism in society.

Meanwhile, Nik Aziz’s press secretary Ahmad Fadhli Shaari chided Utusan’s failure to grasp "such simple statement".

“What Tuan Guru Nik Aziz is saying was I’m not proud to be Malay, but I am proud to be Muslim. All sane people know how to evaluate the statement. It seems that Mingguan Malaysia does not belong to the group,” he quipped.

Read more at http://en.harakah.net.my/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1438:perkasa-utusan-all-riled-up-over-nik-azizs-statement&catid=36:headline&Itemid=70

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Nazri asks if Utusan wants Dr M to replace Najib

September 15, 2010
Nazri questioned Utusan’s apparent lack of loyalty. — file pic
KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 15 — Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz has questioned Utusan Malaysia’s apparent attempts to undermine Datuk Seri Najib Razak, asking the Umno newspaper if it was conspiring to replace the prime minister with predecessor Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

The Umno supreme council member told The Malaysian Insider that from the slant of Utusan Malaysia’s news reports and editorials, it seemed as if the daily had forgotten its own masters.

“I cannot understand Utusan. Who is their boss — Najib or Dr Mahathir?

“I wonder sometimes if they have an agenda to bring back Dr Mahathir to replace Najib,” he said when contacted last night.

The minister in the prime minister’s department explained that by playing up Dr Mahathir’s statements of support for Malay rights group Perkasa, the daily was clearly weakening Najib’s 1 Malaysia concept.

“They should be promoting Najib’s 1 Malaysia and not undermine his programme. [Instead] they are supporting Dr Mahathir.

“Because in the angle of their news reports, they want to give Dr Mahathir more coverage than Najib. They seem to have their own agenda. Do they have an agenda to bring back Dr Mahathir to replace Najib?” he said.

Nazri, however, acknowledged that this made little sense as the daily was owned by the ruling party, of which Najib is president.

“And certainly, 1 Malaysia is Najib’s agenda so Umno-owned papers should be seen to support Najib by promoting 1 Malaysia. But I do not know... I am not directly involved in this.

“Like if you look at Harakah, they promote PAS’s programmes, Suara Keadilan promotes PKR, The Star promotes MCA, but Umno’s paper Utusan does not even support their own bosses,” he said.

Nazri was responding to the daily’s overt promotion of Perkasa despite the recent bid by the ruling Umno leadership to disassociate itself from the Malay rights group, fearing that supporting it would only cause Barisan Nasional (BN) to lose the people’s support.

Ibrahim was labelled a “reject” by the minister.
Dr Mahathir, who is Perkasa’s patron, quickly stepped into the fray to warn Umno against completely rejecting the group, claiming that the ruling party was weak and risked losing the next general election.

Utusan Malaysia seemed to agree with Dr Mahathir on the issue, and in response, the daily has been carrying opinions, features and stories that directly back the former premier and Perkasa.

Its open support for Perkasa in an editorial carried on Sunday had already raised questions on whether the daily was still supporting the Najib administration.

In yesterday’s edition of the conservative Umno newspaper, there were even more strident views published.

A prominent feature in the daily’s Op-Ed section lamented how Malays could no longer speak of their rights anymore without being classed as racist.

The opinion piece also argued against using Perkasa as a scapegoat for BN’s failure to capture the non-Malay votes.

The daily also published a series of quotes from ordinary Malays, accompanied by photographs, under the headline “Majority of Malays support Perkasa”.

Nazri, however, insisted that Utusan Malaysia’s assertions were merely based on selective interviews with the minority of Malays, claiming that it did not necessarily reflect the true feelings of the grassroots.

“To me, they do not represent the feelings of the Malays on the ground because the Malays who support PAS will continue to support PAS regardless of what Utusan says and so will the PKR boys who support (PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri) Anwar (Ibrahim)... they do not care what Utusan says, and the same goes for all,” he said.

Nazri cited an example of his Padang Rengas parliamentary constituency in Perak, pointing out that Perkasa had not even succeeded to cause a ripple in the pool of Malay voters there.

“I am the Padang Rengas Umno division chief. At the grassroots level, no one talks about Perkasa and in my division, no one has joined Perkasa. I think the same goes for the neighbouring areas of Kuala Kangsar, Sungai Siput, Lenggong, Bukit Gantang... Perkasa has no impact whatsoever,” he said.

Nazri added that Perkasa was only being popularised in Utusan Malaysia.

“They have no impact in the rural areas and you want to know why? Because those who are leaders of Perkasa are Umno rejects. Umno members who hold posts in the division will not support Perkasa.

“Look, (Perkasa president Datuk) Ibrahim Ali himself is a reject. His deputy also lost in an Umno division fight and so did his Youth chief,” he said.

Ibrahim, the fiery founder of Perkasa, was sacked from Umno in 2004 and won the Pasir Mas parliamentary seat on a PAS ticket.

Utusan throws its support behind Mahathir and Perkasa

Utusan's top editors hand-picked by Najib
KUALA LUMPUR (Malaysian Insider)— Umno’s Utusan Malaysia continued its campaign backing Perkasa today, and appears to throw its weight behind Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad by citing the former leader’s arguments for the Malay rights group.

In what appears an attempt to show detractors that the Malay rights group has widespread public support, the Malay daily carried opinions, features and stories directly backing Dr Mahathir and Perkasa.

Dr Mahathir recently said that Umno risks losing the next general elections — if it snubbed Perkasa as the party is according to him, weak.

Perkasa leaders have joined that chorus and warned Umno that it could lose the backing from a majority of Malays if it continues plans to distance itself.

Umno-Perkasa row a 'sandiwara'
Utusan’s support for Perkasa in an editorial on Sunday had already raised questions about whether it was still backing party president Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

But today’s edition of the conservative Umno newspaper contained even more strident views in support of Perkasa and Dr Mahathir.

A prominent feature in the daily’s Op-Ed section lamented how Malays could no longer speak of their rights anymore or else they would be classed as racist.

The opinion piece also argued against using Perkasa as a scapegoat for the inability of Barisan Nasional (BN) in getting non-Malay votes.

But much of the arguments put forward appeared to echo the views of Perkasa leaders as well as that of Dr Mahathir.

Najib waits to see which way the wind blows
The Najib administration continues to struggle in its bid to sell its economic reforms to a sceptical public, and this process continues to be made complicated by political curve balls thrown by Perkasa and Dr Mahathir which are being articulated in Utusan.

Since last week, leaders aligned to Najib had begun the process of distancing the party from Perkasa because of the group’s controversial and strident views on economic reforms.

Using the Malay rights platform, Perkasa has been a major obstacle in the way of Najib’s economic reforms which he has assured would not be at the expense of Bumiputeras.

But Perkasa, backed by Dr Mahathir, is against any attempt to roll back the quotas associated with Malaysia’s affirmative action policies.

Last Saturday, Najib spoke on regional satellite station CNBC arguing that “if we don’t make change, we don’t make reforms, Malaysia will slide backwards.”

But the noise surrounding Malay special rights and Perkasa’s role in fighting for the Malays is beginning to drown out Najib’s reforms.

Today, Utusan Malaysia published a series of quotes from ordinary Malays backing Perkasa.

The 16 quotes accompanied by photographs of those interviewed were given prominent play and appeared under the headline “Majority of Malays support Perkasa.”

There were also a number of other stories attacking the senior Umno leaders who had criticised Perkasa.

Many of those interviewed backed Dr Mahathir.

Leading the fray against Perkasa has been Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz, who told The Malaysian Insider that it was “about time” that Umno made a strong stand against Ibrahim and Perkasa.

Nazri, who has been the most vocal of all Umno leaders on the topic of Perkasa, even went a step further to assert that all of Perkasa’s members from Umno and its patron, former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, were political “has-beens”.

Also joining in was Umno secretary-general Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor, who told his BN component party counterparts that Umno will not back Perkasa or Ibrahim in the next general election as such a move will only erode non-Malay support for the ruling coalition.

In this battle of wills in Umno, Utusan Malaysia appears to be firmly in Dr Mahathir’s side.

Related Stories:
VIDEO Suicidal for Umno to part from Perkasa, says Mahathir...
VIDEO Mahathir: Think carefully
VIDEO Ibrahim Ali: Prove it to me, how Perkasa is racist? ...
VIDEO Ibrahim Ali: I hope MCA, Gerakan, MIC are happy now...
VIDEO Goal a 2-party system:Target 5 mil Pakatan supporters...
VIDEO Tsu Koon: Perkasa is an NGO, no need BN endorsement...
VIDEO Ibrahim Ali: Khairy an intelligent boy but not smart enough...
Malaysia tries to curb its pro-Malay policies...
Ibrahim Ali and Perkasa - down but not out yet
Fears about RPK's safety as attacks on Malaysia Today continue...
MCA 'slams' Dr M for saying Umno still needs Perkasa...
Now, Ibrahim Ali wants new political pact with non-Malays ...
Dr M against offshore RM trade, wants traders jailed under ISA...
Mahathir's latest racist blast annoying not scary, faces irrelevancy
Time for Najib to haul up Ibrahim Ali for inciting racial tensions...
Attention swivels from racial politicking to national plunder..
To modernize, can Malaysia move beyond race?
Umno and the average Malay - is the party still relevant?...
Illegal arms: Is Najib, Umno mulling using force to stay in power...
Nurul Izzah - the target of the next Umno 'madness...
Tun Mahathir Mudah Lupa
Malaysia growth at risk as dagger-waving repels ethnic Chinese...
If not social contract, let's talk political contract : Nurul invites PM...
Umno will challenge Ibrahim Ali in Pasir Mas :Tengku Adnan...
Guan Eng: Buck stops with DPM, don't blame education system...
PM must step in if DPM can't solve racist headmistresses fiasco...
Rising racism, 53 years on
Tengku Adnan: Umno still commands Malay support
Nurul vs Khairy: Who will become Prime Minister
DPM spouts zero-tolerance for Namewee, not headmistresses...
A thrilling battle is building up for the 13th General Election...
PM has right to talk to Taib, but time not right for Taib to exit...
Dump 'Islam-distorting' UMNO, says Hadi Awang...
Mahathir's latest racist blast annoying not scary, faces irrelevancy
Time for Najib to haul up Ibrahim Ali for inciting racial tensions...
Poll: 45% of Malays, 55% of Chinese unhappy with Umno...
Nazri to BN ministers: Represent all, not just your party or race...
To curb popularity for 1Malaysia, Dr M spews angry race rhetoric...
BN headed for an implosion as Umno, Perkasa attack MCA, Gerakan...
Najib speaks up on MCA-Umno row, spelling doom forMalaysia...

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Umno-MCA war: Utusan begins assault on MCA


By Syed Jaymal Zahiid

KUALA LUMPUR: The rumble between Umno and its Chinese allies in the Barisan Nasional has escalated, with the Umno-linked newspaper Utusan Malaysia dedicating pages of articles focused on flaying the MCA following its bold calls for economic liberalisation.

The MCA-organised Chinese Economic Congress last Saturday passed 13 resolutions, with some touching on sensitive policies such as calling for the gradual removal of the 30% Bumiputera corporate equity, and increased participation of non-Malays in government-linked companies.

This forced Umno's top leaders to retaliate, with its deputy president Muhyiddin Yassin and vice-president Hishammuddin Tun Hussein warning MCA to stick to the ruling coalition's struggle and principles.

But MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek will not barge, arguing that Umno's old ways of doing things and the failure by the Malay party to recognise its weaknesses will only lead to MCA's demise.

In an apparent retaliation against MCA and its president, Utusan published stinging articles with venomous headlines like "MCA's demands are ungrateful", "Don't play with fire" and a half-page column urging the Chinese party to tow the line.

There was also an article seemingly aimed at fanning racial sentiments when it attacked Chua's statement yesterday that MCA will have no qualms sharing similar stance with the DAP for the benefit of the electorate.

No space was given to Chinese voices on the issue.

In the column entitled 'Hormati sepakatan sedia ada' (Respect the current pact), the writer dismissed the demands by MCA and its readiness to stand on the same ground as the DAP as "immature". She also described the DAP as rogues who are disrespectful of the Malays.

There was also a clear intention to drive a wedge between PAS and the DAP and instigating racial sentiments in the article when the writer said the Chinese-based party in Pakatan Rakyat is the stumbling block to PAS' Islamic state aspirations.

"Just look at the demands made by the Chinese Economic Congress. Among its demands is that the government gives licences to F class contractors based on merits and not race. Doesn't Chua Soi Lek know that the majority of F class contractors are Bumiputeras whose livelihoods depend on Chinese suppliers... in this context, who are the kings of the economy if not the Chinese?" wrote the writer.

Several parts of the column condemned the MCA and Chua for being "insensitive" to the "economic plight" of the Malays and also rebuked them for being unable to comprehend the idea of "just and equitable economic distribution".

Malays have been tolerant enough

Chua, a former health minister, had also said that MCA, which is drastically losing support, must change its ways to stay relevant among the voters and is resolved to regain their trust no matter what the risks are.

The articles in Utusan harped on this. Many called the shift of paradigm in MCA's battle for voters "arrogant" and bordering on extremism, with total disregard for the Federal Constitution which enshrines Malay special positions in the country.

"Are there no other ways for MCA to win back Chinese support? Why are they making the Malays the scapegoat?

"The fact of the matter... is that everytime there is a new demand that corrodes the special position of the Bumiputeras that has been agreed upon, the feelings... of the Bumiputeras especially the Malays are hurt.

"The fact of the matter is that the Malays have long been tolerant up to the point where some would say: 'Never mind that some of the citizens can't even speak the national language as long as we live in peace and harmony," read the column.

The assaults by Utusan and the warnings by Umno have now placed MCA in a fix: it risks straining relations with the Malay party, the ruling coalition's lynchpin, or be labelled as cowards and lose more Chinese support if it backs down on its demands.

Either way, the opposition, particularly the DAP, would be ready to exploit the worsening tension between the two in the battle for Chinese votes and these are testing times for the 61-year-old MCA.

Also read:

DPM warns MCA on Bumi equity

MCA-Umno tension worsens with Chua joining the fray

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Herald row: Anwar holds Utusan responsible

PKR de facto leader accused Umno-owned newspaper Utusan Malaysia for inciting the Muslims over the court decision to allow Catholic weekly The Herald to use the term 'Allah' in its Bahasa Malaysia section.

He said that the newspaper had for “weeks and months” whipped the Malay community into a frenzy over the controversy, which erupted into several protests after Friday prayers yesterday.

NONE“(They were) supported by the ruling establishment. Now you can organise demonstrations, without permits for the first time, but only for that particular occasion by the keris minister (Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein).

“What happened? They actually encouraged people to resort to extremism and even become perpetrators of violence,” he said during a public forum in Petaling Jaya today.

Early yesterday morning, three churches in Petaling Jaya and Kuala Lumpur were hit with petrol bombs hours before the protests were scheduled to start.

Prominent scholar disagrees

One of the church was set ablaze in the brazen attack, believed to be the first of its kind in Malaysia.

Anwar called for calm and said that the reactions to the 'Allah' controversy was an “insult not only Malaysians but Muslims and Islam”.

Earlier, Anwar recounted his meeting with renowned Egyptian Muslim scholar Yusof Al-Qardawi, who expressed surprise that some Malaysian Muslims objected to non-Muslims using the term 'Allah'.

“I said no, not me (who objected), but some 'born-again' Muslims in Umno,” said Anwar, to the laughter of some 100 people in attendance.

Anwar said Yusof responded by saying that such a position was unjustifiable.

“There is nothing in the Quran and our historical legacy that can justify the banning (of non-Muslims from using) the word 'Allah',” he said.

'Selangor anthem quandary'

Anwar explained that it would make life extremely difficult in Arab countries if there was such a ban as the word is commonly used by both Muslims and non-Muslims there.

“In Arab countries, it is very usual for people to respond to questions (in this manner): Can you come to my house tomorrow for supper? Well, I'll have to think about it, insha'allah (God willing).

NONE“Charge him in court!” cried Anwar mockingly, prompting another round of giggles from the audience.

Anwar also quipped that in Selangor, Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim is worried because non-Muslims may now be banned from singing the state anthem - 'Allah pelihara Sultan (God save the Sultan)'.

Anwar was speaking at the Global Issues Forum III on corruption at the Petaling Jaya Civic Centre, organised by the PKR International Bureau.

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Nazri tells Utusan to stop racist agenda

By Asrul Hadi Abdullah Sani

Enough with the racism, says Nazri. — file pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 16 — Umno maverick Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz has continued to condemn Utusan Malaysia for its “outdated” racist propaganda, saying the Umno-owned newspaper must accept that Malaysia is a multi-racial country.

“They should stop it because how would we (the Malays) like it if people say that Malays are lazy and stupid? We would also get angry. Don’t do to others what we don’t want others to do unto us,” the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department told The Malaysian Insider.

The Umno supreme council member had earlier castigated the Malay daily for defending the controversial National Civics Bureau, or Biro Tata Negara (BTN), for its courses which he said were racist. The opposition has also claimed that BTN propagated political indoctrination.

“And more so now, under the prime minister (Datuk Seri Najib Razak) and 1 Malaysia, we must accept that Malaysia is a multi-racial country,” he added.

Utusan has been a mouthpiece for Umno ultra-nationalists and a tool for defending the party’s “Ketuanan Melayu” (Malay supremacy) policy.

The newspaper has also been criticised for being used to attack the opposition and ratcheting up racial tensions.