Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Did he or didn't he? Let the third man speak

Image

Did the MCA president, Ong Tee Keat, receive RM10 million in cash from Kuala Dimensi's Tiong King Sing? Ong says no and Tiong says yes. That means we need a third person to tell us which of the two is telling the truth. And that third person should be the one who packed the money and acted as the courier between the two.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

'Leaked documents' details RM10 mil transfer

A document has surfaced on the Internet with detailed descriptions of how Bintulu MP Tiong King Sing allegedly transferred RM10 million to MCA president Ong Tee Keat.

Contacted today, Tiong (right) confirmed the veracity of the document, describing it as a witness statement from one of his political aides.

However, he vehemently denied that he leaked the document, adding that he was surprised by how the document was "leaked".

"I didn't leak it. I have no idea where it came from. He (the witness) said he did not leak it," said Tiong, who is currently in China on business.

He said that other than his lawyers, only certain government agencies have the same document.


To me this is a FAKE Document, lets see what others comment on this issue .

written by Sutha, September 09, 2009 01:29:40
A desperado wanting to escape from the Scandal of the Billions (meaning lifetime imprisonment) would resort to any shameless act, including getting his assistant to put his dobbymark (for $) on prepared letter, witnessed by a lawyer.
Which assistant of corrupted politician-businessman has not tasted money and money's worth? He would even sign a Statutory Declaration and have it attested.
Money speaks aloud. And for some, Money is the greater god!

written by StevenO, September 09, 2009 01:37:10
Not really credible in view that the shit had already hit the ceiling fan!! Moreover the date of the report is not convincing enough. If I were to rip off that kind of money from PKFZ, I could easily produce 50 copies of such reports.
report abuse

written by TaiLow, September 09, 2009 02:17:30
i think this Azman fella is lying, he mentioned the counting too many times, why? unless he wanted to make sure the figures add up to the exact amount to make up the story, if this is acceptable they might as well ask Tiong to make one himself.
"I swear I give him the money"

written by Rigi9, September 09, 2009 03:24:34
very funny - the guy Azman remembers everything in the 1st incident but not the car type or the number plate of the car where he unloaded 5 million ringgit.....strange, he seems to give every other account in detail except that. I think it's a fix by Tiong...the culprit is Tiong not Ong

Was the money meant to buy silence on PKFZ? If that is so, would one want to lose the opportunity to make sure that the other party does not raise his guard? The question that should be asked is why money was transferred willingly without condition as it would appear? Was it not the intention to stop further investigation by claiming that money have been transferred? If it was a donation to a political party, was that meant to make the party obliged not to pursue PKFZ. If the gift was to the Minister was it meant to make him obliged not to pursue the matter. In life, one cannot demand other not to try to influence one's actions. When one is in public office, not taking a ride offered could constitute an offence, especially one has been around in the same social circle.

It was said that money were laid in boxes, and boxes transferred. Are they the same boxes, and even if it is do we know that the content remains the same?
When the persons take million as pettey cash, made possible by getting people to sign payment in billions as if a donation by the government, it is not difficult to create doubts, especially at the time when hot battle is being pursued.

If I were asked to receive the money, I would. And I would even deposit them in bank. But if what are actually received are fruits said to be from Sarawak, fruits certainly cannot be deposited at the bank.

written by Awang Hitam, September 09, 2009 11:19:44
I tak peduli berkenaan hasrat MCA dan TSK. Kalau Azman ini tidak tahu BONNET daripada BOOT kereta; susah nak perchayai SD nya.
Kalau lah benar SD, butir-butir di sebut tidak begitu jelas pula!
Ai! teruk nya orang Melayu BN ini, seluar tergelunchur pur tak tahu nonoknya terkeluar!

written by Sinewy, September 09, 2009 14:38:19
This fella works for a filthy rich money sucker. So how much is this self declaration worth??? For anyone now to jump to the conclusion to judge OTK, don't we need a more independant evidence and witness that this so called self declaration before we come to a conclusion?? If OTK also makes a self declaration that there is no truth in this fella's declaration, will we accept his counter declaration to nullify this fella??? If we don't then are we not being prejudice towards OTK????

My Opinion :
This purported leak document ( not a SD ) is a Fake . Many questions unanswered .


For a political aide to the Chairman of the BBC to not being able to tell the difference between the car bonnet and the boot . Kept saying he put the money in the bonnet .
In para 6 and in para 13 there's always the statement that states Datuk Seri ( TKS ) walking out with Ong Tee Keat . If there's an illegal transfer of money , don't you think you should not want to be seen and photograph ? Any meeting could have been arranged to meet with OTK to discuss about other matters while not necessary for money transfer .
Any money transfers would not have been made so open and in fruit boxes ? or A4 size boxes ? why not just give a cheque since its a donation ? Why the need to keep emphasise he walked out with Ong Tee Keat ? Is it that Ong might not know anything at all about the transfer of money ? Why keep on mentioning Datuk Seri keluar bersama Ong ? trying to imply that the money was given to Ong ? Does it makes sense ? Its a load of RUBBISH !


In para 7 , this joker Azman ( the two of them having same name ? what a coincidence?) transferring 2.5 m into a car and does not know the number plate and make of the car ? Could the car actually belong to another employee of Tiong ? or to someone else ? Want to bullshitt , please make your story more believable lah !!

In para 9 you sampai office , ask Winnie the secretary buka office , ambil wang dan mengira wang jumlah 1 juta , adalah Winnie di tepi you bila you mengira wang ?? Wah you so kuat , boleh mengambil wang dari boss office anytime , money not in safe deposit box ? you have the combination number to open and take money ? So much money in the office ? How long you take to count the money ? In $50 or $100 bills ?, secretary also not with you overseeing you ada ambil lebih atau tidak ? wah itu duit macam toilet paper atau hell bank notes !!!

In para 10 , so simple , your boss give you number hand phone Ong , ask you to call Ong , why not when you reach the place , call your boss Tiong and say , boss I sudah sampai , you panggil Ong ?
Lagi Ong doesn't know you , you ingat dia mau jawab your call ? it could be an MACC officer calling , out to trap ? Hello your bullshit , easy to detect , pembohong besar macam boss kau !!!

In para 11 , again money delivered to a person driving a Hyundai Sonata but no car registration number ??? give money but no car number ?? must be Kereta Hantu !!! Bodoh betul !

In para 13 , wah sekarang banyak pandai you can tell the Kia milik Ong Tee Keat ? tapi bodoh sangat , lagi tiada nombor kereta ?

Summary

Two times mentioned Korean cars , not other makes , Malaysia got only Korean cars , three times not able to give the car registration , three times mentioned bonnet instead of boot, you don't keep money in the engine compartment . Siapa boleh percaya ? Who can believe this crap story ? Hantu tipu sahaja boleh percaya cerita kau !! Only the cheats , liars , swindlers can believe this crap story !!
All the three transfers have no date mentioned , don't you think it's strange when you write a statement or SD you would say On this date at this time , I was asked to deliver two boxes of fruits , Sarawakian apples to so and so in this place ...I was asked to deliver to anyone who drives a Korean car and who stops near my car ...The car number is HSBC 799 ...blah...blah ..blah.( hsbc is how seow bo choon ) and the 799 stands for chit (7 )se lang 99 chan .
All three transfers were to people unknown , big money given to who ? Maybe the money given to another person to be deposited into another account of the same person ! Money from left pocket enters the right pocket ! Money is from personal account or from company account ? Could it be from company account and goes into the person's unidentified personal account ? How come they can believe the person and simply give the money ? They should have known the car number , they would have been informed that you pass the money to a car having this number whose driver looks like ...Tio...chubby looking , wearing glasses ..wearing a certain checked color shirt .....

Tak paya leak ..report polis sahaja , lebih senang ! kau takut make false polis report ???

5 comments:

  1. KUALA LUMPUR - The prime minister has reminded all BN component party leaders that it was pointless for them to be popular only among party members if they are not popular among the people.
    Najib Abdul Razak, who is the BN chairman, said in a parliamentary democracy, the people had the absolute power and it was they who determined the BN's fate in every election.
    "Whether we are leaders of Umno, MCA, MIC or other BN component parties... we should ask ourselves whether we are popular among the people and not just among party members.
    "If we are popular among party members, we can win party posts, but whether our party is relevant or not, it depends on our ability to win the hearts of the people to support the BN," he said when opening the 63rd MIC Annual General Assembly at the Dewan Merdeka, Putra World Trade Centre here Saturday.

    It is for this reason that Umno, MCA, MIC and other BN component parties should remember to see things from this perspective, for if we forget, we will be punished by people during elections," he said


    IF MCA CHOSE THE ADULTERER TO LEAD, YOU WILL NOT GET THE CHINESE SUPPORT THATS FOR SURE. WHAT KPI CSL CAN OFFER ARE HOW MANY ROUND HE IS ABLE PREFORMS.......

    ReplyDelete
  2. Xiean

    No One wants him . not even Pakatan and DAP . Truly NOT welcome .

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also didn't mentioned if the money ( cash ) was in 50 ringgit or 100 ringgit bills . The number of fruit boxes will double accordingly .

    If the bills were in 1o ringgit bills , can someone here tells me how long it takes to count the money ?
    What about the 50 and the 100 ringgit bills ? long it tales to count 2.5 million ringgit ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't like MCA, to me MCA is nothing but a bunch of running dogs

    But I have to say I do respect OTK for his guts and his sense of dignity

    No other guy (or gal, for that matter) has ever dare to expose the multi-BILLION scandal like OTK

    To hell with chuashakeleg --- that guy has lost all my sympathy once he uttered something like "the revealing of the (Port Klang) scandal has seriously damaged the reputation of bn and mca"

    ReplyDelete
  5. What CSL supporters promoting is NOT a save MCA campaign, but Toppling the MCA President campaign to protect their own interest, thats is the message the society get.

    The risk is very high that MCA will be doomed and make irrelevant if those selfish people success in their aims, on the other hand to support the President courageous and painful but necessary reforms, is building to strengthen MCA, surely stand a better chances to bring glorious day back to MCA. And yet those selfish people spent a lot of money, time and vigorous effort to take the high risk path of destroying MCA, if that is not personal interest then what is it???

    MCA people must understand that the time is already over that they can throw their nuisance for the public to swallow. Najib have rightly put it, the people call the shot.......So what you wise MCA guys can offer, CSL as MCA president ???.......

    Those, CSL supporters must agree with me that ultimately the public will have the last say, if you people really have MCA at heart, you people should do the RIGHT THING, weight the probability who can better lead you to success. Take the trouble to go to the ground to gather statistics what the public want, CSL or OTK. That will be productive effort, best still call for a referendum among the Chinese Community who they prefer as MCA President, CSL or OTK. That will definitely strengthen MCA instead weakening MCA with your rubbishes.

    Today while in the market I met Jeff Ooi with his DAP people distributing bags to the community and I have seen him many time in the various markers. IN CONTRAST MCA POPLE ARE VERY BUSY TRYING VERY HARD TO TOPPLE A CAPABLE PRESIDENT TO WEAKEN THEIR PILLAR .........

    ReplyDelete

All slanderous comments will be deleted .Comments that include personal attacks, and antisocial behaviour such as spamming and trolling; will be removed. You are fully responsible for the content you post. Please be responsible and stay on topic.