British homeowner who maimed burglar walks free
Awais Hussain (centre), son of Munir Hussain, flanked by his family's solicitor Razi Shah (left) speaks to the media outside the High Court in London yesterday. — Reuters pic
LONDON, Jan 21 — A businessman who was jailed for savagely attacking burglars who broke into his home and threatened his family was freed yesterday.
Munir Hussain 53, had been sentenced to 30 months for grievous bodily harm with intent after he hit Walid Salem with a cricket bat in September 2008. But at the Appeal Court, Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, and two other judges overturned the sentence, replacing it with a two-year suspended term, the Press Association reported.
Hussain and his wife and children had returned from their local mosque during Ramadan to find intruders wearing balaclavas in their home.
He feared for their lives as their hands were tied behind their backs and they were forced to crawl from room to room.
The businessman made his escape after throwing a coffee table and enlisted his brother, Tokeer, to help chase the offenders down the street in High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, bringing one of them to the ground.
What followed was described at Reading Crown Court as self-defence which went too far, leaving intruder Salem with a permanent brain injury after he was struck with a cricket bat so hard that it broke into three pieces.
Lord Judge said: "This trial had nothing to do with the right of the householder to defend themselves or their families or their homes.
"The burglary was over and the burglars had gone. No one was in any further danger from them."
He added: "This is not, and should not be seen as, a case about the level of violence which a householder may lawfully and justifiably use on a burglar.
"So far as both these appellants were concerned, the purpose of their violence was revenge — to teach at least one of the burglars a lesson... such violence is not lawful..."
But he said he was showing "mercy" to Hussain. — Reuters
This is what I meant when I posted this comment !
Wee this is not England !
In case you are not aware of English laws , any would be burglars or thieves in England and who gets injured while attempting or in the act of committing buglary can sue the owner of the house who may or may not be around at the time of the burglary .
Wee is the thief who wants to sue the victim. I agree with J4OTK. This is not like the stupid British. In Malaysia, we whack the thief until he is dead.
ReplyDeleteAnon 10:38
ReplyDeleteCorrect , correct , correct , we whack them until they are half dead before handling them over to the police . So if they are dead in police custody , none of our business . hahaha
Anon 10:38
ReplyDeleteThis is the home owners right when confronted with thieves and burglars . When caught in Malaysia , this is trespassing , when caught can be shot on sight in the owners property , however in England , if you whack them in your property , they can sue you . If they injure themselves climbing in or out of your property , they can sue you .
If you leave your house empty and comes back after a holiday , in Malaysia we whack them and hand them over to the police , in England you have to get a court order to evict them even though you are the owner and they are thieves .