Did he or didn't he? Let the third man speak

Did the MCA president, Ong Tee Keat, receive RM10 million in cash from Kuala Dimensi's Tiong King Sing? Ong says no and Tiong says yes. That means we need a third person to tell us which of the two is telling the truth. And that third person should be the one who packed the money and acted as the courier between the two.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

'Leaked documents' details RM10 mil transfer

A document has surfaced on the Internet with detailed descriptions of how Bintulu MP Tiong King Sing allegedly transferred RM10 million to MCA president Ong Tee Keat.

Contacted today, Tiong (right) confirmed the veracity of the document, describing it as a witness statement from one of his political aides.

However, he vehemently denied that he leaked the document, adding that he was surprised by how the document was "leaked".

"I didn't leak it. I have no idea where it came from. He (the witness) said he did not leak it," said Tiong, who is currently in China on business.

He said that other than his lawyers, only certain government agencies have the same document.

To me this is a FAKE Document, lets see what others comment on this issue .

written by Sutha, September 09, 2009 01:29:40
A desperado wanting to escape from the Scandal of the Billions (meaning lifetime imprisonment) would resort to any shameless act, including getting his assistant to put his dobbymark (for $) on prepared letter, witnessed by a lawyer.
Which assistant of corrupted politician-businessman has not tasted money and money's worth? He would even sign a Statutory Declaration and have it attested.
Money speaks aloud. And for some, Money is the greater god!

written by StevenO, September 09, 2009 01:37:10
Not really credible in view that the shit had already hit the ceiling fan!! Moreover the date of the report is not convincing enough. If I were to rip off that kind of money from PKFZ, I could easily produce 50 copies of such reports.
report abuse

written by TaiLow, September 09, 2009 02:17:30
i think this Azman fella is lying, he mentioned the counting too many times, why? unless he wanted to make sure the figures add up to the exact amount to make up the story, if this is acceptable they might as well ask Tiong to make one himself.
"I swear I give him the money"

written by Rigi9, September 09, 2009 03:24:34
very funny - the guy Azman remembers everything in the 1st incident but not the car type or the number plate of the car where he unloaded 5 million ringgit.....strange, he seems to give every other account in detail except that. I think it's a fix by Tiong...the culprit is Tiong not Ong

Was the money meant to buy silence on PKFZ? If that is so, would one want to lose the opportunity to make sure that the other party does not raise his guard? The question that should be asked is why money was transferred willingly without condition as it would appear? Was it not the intention to stop further investigation by claiming that money have been transferred? If it was a donation to a political party, was that meant to make the party obliged not to pursue PKFZ. If the gift was to the Minister was it meant to make him obliged not to pursue the matter. In life, one cannot demand other not to try to influence one's actions. When one is in public office, not taking a ride offered could constitute an offence, especially one has been around in the same social circle.

It was said that money were laid in boxes, and boxes transferred. Are they the same boxes, and even if it is do we know that the content remains the same?
When the persons take million as pettey cash, made possible by getting people to sign payment in billions as if a donation by the government, it is not difficult to create doubts, especially at the time when hot battle is being pursued.

If I were asked to receive the money, I would. And I would even deposit them in bank. But if what are actually received are fruits said to be from Sarawak, fruits certainly cannot be deposited at the bank.

written by Awang Hitam, September 09, 2009 11:19:44
I tak peduli berkenaan hasrat MCA dan TSK. Kalau Azman ini tidak tahu BONNET daripada BOOT kereta; susah nak perchayai SD nya.
Kalau lah benar SD, butir-butir di sebut tidak begitu jelas pula!
Ai! teruk nya orang Melayu BN ini, seluar tergelunchur pur tak tahu nonoknya terkeluar!

written by Sinewy, September 09, 2009 14:38:19
This fella works for a filthy rich money sucker. So how much is this self declaration worth??? For anyone now to jump to the conclusion to judge OTK, don't we need a more independant evidence and witness that this so called self declaration before we come to a conclusion?? If OTK also makes a self declaration that there is no truth in this fella's declaration, will we accept his counter declaration to nullify this fella??? If we don't then are we not being prejudice towards OTK????

My Opinion :
This purported leak document ( not a SD ) is a Fake . Many questions unanswered .

For a political aide to the Chairman of the BBC to not being able to tell the difference between the car bonnet and the boot . Kept saying he put the money in the bonnet .
In para 6 and in para 13 there's always the statement that states Datuk Seri ( TKS ) walking out with Ong Tee Keat . If there's an illegal transfer of money , don't you think you should not want to be seen and photograph ? Any meeting could have been arranged to meet with OTK to discuss about other matters while not necessary for money transfer .
Any money transfers would not have been made so open and in fruit boxes ? or A4 size boxes ? why not just give a cheque since its a donation ? Why the need to keep emphasise he walked out with Ong Tee Keat ? Is it that Ong might not know anything at all about the transfer of money ? Why keep on mentioning Datuk Seri keluar bersama Ong ? trying to imply that the money was given to Ong ? Does it makes sense ? Its a load of RUBBISH !

In para 7 , this joker Azman ( the two of them having same name ? what a coincidence?) transferring 2.5 m into a car and does not know the number plate and make of the car ? Could the car actually belong to another employee of Tiong ? or to someone else ? Want to bullshitt , please make your story more believable lah !!

In para 9 you sampai office , ask Winnie the secretary buka office , ambil wang dan mengira wang jumlah 1 juta , adalah Winnie di tepi you bila you mengira wang ?? Wah you so kuat , boleh mengambil wang dari boss office anytime , money not in safe deposit box ? you have the combination number to open and take money ? So much money in the office ? How long you take to count the money ? In $50 or $100 bills ?, secretary also not with you overseeing you ada ambil lebih atau tidak ? wah itu duit macam toilet paper atau hell bank notes !!!

In para 10 , so simple , your boss give you number hand phone Ong , ask you to call Ong , why not when you reach the place , call your boss Tiong and say , boss I sudah sampai , you panggil Ong ?
Lagi Ong doesn't know you , you ingat dia mau jawab your call ? it could be an MACC officer calling , out to trap ? Hello your bullshit , easy to detect , pembohong besar macam boss kau !!!

In para 11 , again money delivered to a person driving a Hyundai Sonata but no car registration number ??? give money but no car number ?? must be Kereta Hantu !!! Bodoh betul !

In para 13 , wah sekarang banyak pandai you can tell the Kia milik Ong Tee Keat ? tapi bodoh sangat , lagi tiada nombor kereta ?

Summary

Two times mentioned Korean cars , not other makes , Malaysia got only Korean cars , three times not able to give the car registration , three times mentioned bonnet instead of boot, you don't keep money in the engine compartment . Siapa boleh percaya ? Who can believe this crap story ? Hantu tipu sahaja boleh percaya cerita kau !! Only the cheats , liars , swindlers can believe this crap story !!
All the three transfers have no date mentioned , don't you think it's strange when you write a statement or SD you would say On this date at this time , I was asked to deliver two boxes of fruits , Sarawakian apples to so and so in this place ...I was asked to deliver to anyone who drives a Korean car and who stops near my car ...The car number is HSBC 799 ...blah...blah ..blah.( hsbc is how seow bo choon ) and the 799 stands for chit (7 )se lang 99 chan .
All three transfers were to people unknown , big money given to who ? Maybe the money given to another person to be deposited into another account of the same person ! Money from left pocket enters the right pocket ! Money is from personal account or from company account ? Could it be from company account and goes into the person's unidentified personal account ? How come they can believe the person and simply give the money ? They should have known the car number , they would have been informed that you pass the money to a car having this number whose driver looks like ...Tio...chubby looking , wearing glasses ..wearing a certain checked color shirt .....

Tak paya leak ..report polis sahaja , lebih senang ! kau takut make false polis report ???