The Role Played by Anwar Ibrahim
When he was in ABIM to become Education Minister and later when he was Deputy Prime Minister to the Mamak fella !( highlighted in red )
1957: The  Reid Commission drafted the Federal Constitution, and at the behest of  one of the Commission members, Mr. Justice Abdul Hamid of West Pakistan  High Court, Article 3 (1) was formulated as such: “Islam is the religion  of the Federation …”
1966: Restrictions were placed on the  employment, entry and residence of priests and religious personnel. This  led to the reduction of religious personnel in mission schools.
1974: The Red Cross Society was re-named Red Crescent Society.
1974  to present: The airing of Islamic television and radio programmes began  increasing. From 1974 onwards, prime time television programmes were  paused to air the Azans [Muslim prayer]. In 1982 Islamic content on TV  stood at 10 per cent; in 1988 it rose to 17.5 per cent.
In 2007,  new station TV9 was launched, which features mainly Islamic programming.  There is no coverage of non-Muslim religious programs, save for during  the respective festivals.Songs that contain the word ‘Jesus’ have been  banned [eg: “Jesus to a Child” by George Michael], as well as movies  depicting prophets [eg: “Prince of Egypt”, a film about the life of  Moses].
1979: The Islamic Revolution and revivalism in Iran had a  direct effect on Muslims here. Muslim clerics began exhorting their  faithful to return to the fundamentals of the faith. The Angkatan Budaya  Islam Malaysia [Malaysian Islamic Cultural Force] (ABIM) led by Anwar  Ibrahim started the dakwah [the call] movement mainly among government  college and university students.Muslim women, for the first time, were  seen donning the tudung [head covering]. Over the years, wearing of the  tudung has become the norm amongst Muslim women.
1981: The  Indonesian translation of the Bible – “Alkitab” was banned under the  Internal Security Act. The ban was later lifted on condition the books  were restricted to Christian use.
In 2000, the Bahasa Malaysia  translation of “Alkitab” was confiscated by the Special Branch from the  Daughters of St. Paul bookstore in Petaling Jaya. The then Deputy PM  Abdullah Badawi later released the books on condition that the words  “for Christians only” were printed on the cover.
1984: It became  illegal for non-Muslims to use 49 ‘Islamic’ words including Allah [God],  Alhamdulilah [Praise be to God] and Insya Allah [God willing].
1985:  The then Deputy Prime Minister [PM] Datuk Musa Hitam said, “The  government has set up a committee to co-ordinate the various aspects of  Islamic Syariah and civil laws in line with efforts to infuse Islamic  values into the Administration.” [New Straits Times (NST) 9 March ‘85]
Aug 1986: ABIM proposes to government that, “Islamic laws be the basis of legislation in Malaysia.” [NST 25 Aug ‘86]
Sep  1986: The Federal and State governments agreed to the integration of  Syariah and Civil Courts. The then Lord President Tun Salleh Abas said  this integration was a first step toward the Islamisation of laws in the  country. He also said that changes should not be made drastically … the  best changes are those which are imperceptible. [The Star 25 Sep ‘86].
The  above situation led to a written protest by the Malaysian Consultative  Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism and Sikhism [MCCBCHS], and a  nationwide church and temple signature campaign denouncing the plans.
1988:  The then Minister of Education Anwar Ibrahim, directed all Principals,  aged fifty-five and above who were religious, to stop service with  immediate effect. The Principals who took over were mostly Muslim.
Subsequently,
Moral Education replaced Christian religious education in these schools. The majority of Moral Education teachers were Muslim.
Crucifixes in mission schools were removed.
School history textbooks glorified Islam and Islamic civilisation over other religions.
“Islamic Civilisation” was introduced as a compulsory subject for all university students.
1988:  Article 121 of the Federal Constitution was amended by Art. 121 (1A),  to state that, the Civil Courts “shall have no jurisdiction in respect  of any matter within the jurisdiction of the Syariah Courts.”
The  result of this amendment led to the Civil Courts being unable to  adjudicate in cases where the Islamic ingredient is present  notwithstanding the fact the person seeking judicial relief or remedy is  a non-Muslim, especially in matters related to conversion, matrimony,  children’s custody and burial.
Over the years, case law has shown:
a  person who converts to Islam can get his/her civil marriage dissolved  by the Syariah court, automatically gains custody of children and is  allowed to convert them without the non-Muslim parent’s consent  [Subashini v Saravanan].
a person who converts out of Islam cannot  change religious status on his/her Identity Card without permission from  the Syariah Court [Lina Joy case].
a person who applies to the  Syariah Court to convert away from Islam is forced into rehabilitative  detention [Revathi Masoosai case ].
State Islamic authorities are  given power by the Syariah Courts to claim, exhume and bury deceased  persons who they deem as Muslims, regardless of the insistence of family  members to the contrary [Moorthy Marian and Rayappan Anthony cases].
1980s:  In line with Article 11 (4) of the Federal Constitution: “State and  federal law may restrict the propagation of any other religious doctrine  among Muslims”, the Control and Restriction of the Propagation of  Non-Islamic Religions Enactment was passed in six states. The penalties  for such violations are a maximum RM10,000 fine or one year’s jail, or  both.
Five persons including a former Muslim were detained  without trial under the ISA for allegedly performing missionary work  amongst Muslims.
During the 80s the print media attempted to  portray that Christian evangelism was a threat to the Muslim faith. As  an example, on 9 Oct ’87, the NST reported that, “Christians attempted  to convert Muslims with bribe money”. On 5 Oct ’87 Mingguan Islam  alleged that US$100bil was provided by the “World Federation of  Churches” for the Christianisation of Muslims. The Malaysian  Consultative Council on Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism and Sikhism  [MCCBCHS] asserted that both these stories were false. Furthermore,  there is no such body as the “World Federation of Churches”.
1980s  to present: Approvals for building of non-Muslim places of worship  became increasingly difficult. Unusual conditions were imposed – height  restrictions on steeples, design restrictions temple domes – Sikh  gurdwaras are barred from building their traditional domes for fear that  it may cause confusion for looking too mosque-like.
The Church  of the Divine Mercy in Shah Alam took no less than 28 years to be  approved and built due to vexatious bureaucratic delays and protests  from residents.
To date, over 10 Hindu temples have been demolished by local councils on grounds that the structures were illegal.
1980s  to present: Muslims by virtue of paying their tithes [zakat] are  allowed a tax rebate of the amount tithed. This has resulted in Muslims  having a lower effective tax rate, while non-Muslims with the same level  of income are taxed a higher percentage.
1993: Banks and finance companies were allowed to offer Islamic banking services.
1993:  Kelantan State Legislative Assembly, which is under the control of  opposition Parti Islam SeMalaysia [PAS], passed the Syariah Criminal  Code [II] Bill, which included Hudud laws that call for stoning to death  and chopping of limbs – these laws could be applied to those from any  religion. [As the Federal Government does not recognise these laws, to  date, they have not yet been enforced.]
1999: The ruling Barisan  Nasional [BN] party suffered its biggest setback in its history when  apart from Kelantan, also lost the state of Terengganu to PAS in the  General Elections.
PAS, with its vision of setting up a  Syariah-based Islamic State, replaced the Democratic Action Party [DAP]  as the main opposition party in Parliament.
This led to a race between the BN and PAS to try and ‘out-Islamise’ each other by posturing themselves to appear more ‘Islamic’.
2001:  In an apparent attempt to thwart support for PAS’ plans of an Islamic  State should it come into power, the then PM Mahathir Mohamed declared  that Malaysia was already a “model Islamic Country”. Despite public  outcry from the non-Muslim population, the non-Malay component parties  within the ruling coalition were either compliant or silent on the  issue.
2002: The policy “Absorption of Islamic Values” into  government administration was launched. According to the booklet,  “Malaysia is an Islamic Country”, the “policy will be implemented on a  continuous basis until the goal of entrenching Islam into the nation’s  system is fully achieved.” The booklet was later withdrawn but the  policy is arguably still in force.
2004: PAS was ousted by the  DAP as main opposition party in Parliament when it lost Terengganu to  the BN and retained Kelantan by the narrowest of margins in the General  Election. The BN, helmed by new PM Abdullah Badawi, experienced its  biggest victory to date winning nine tenths of the contested  Parliamentary seats.
Badawi then introduced the new concept of Islam Hadhari [Civilisational Islam].
2005:  Plans to set up an Interfaith Commission, a statutory non-adjudicative  body to assist the government in shaping coherent policy pertaining to  religious harmony, were scuttled by widespread protests from Muslim  activists who alleged the Commission would “interfere with the holiness  of Islam”.
2005: City Hall enforcement officers arrested a  non-Muslim couple for hugging and kissing in a public park. The couple  appealed to the Federal Court, which ruled that City Hall was correct.  The decision has now empowered local council authorities to act as  morality police.
2006: An elderly American couple on holiday in  Langkawi were harassed and humiliated by State religious enforcement  officers who raided their apartment on suspicion they were Muslims  committing khalwat [close proximity] – an offence under Syariah law.
2006:  A coalition of non-governmental organisations [NGOs] formed “Article  11” [named after the constitutional provision which enshrines freedom of  religion], with the intention of reminding the government to defend the  Federal Constitution and reaffirm the country’s secular nature. Their  nationwide fora were repeatedly disrupted by Islamist activists. The PM  stepped in and assuaged the protestors by putting a halt “Article 11’s”  activities.
2006: The Attorney General’s Chambers now has a  Syariah unit whose functions, inter alia, are to “take steps toward the  realisation of a set of laws and specific body that will be responsible  for the harmonisation of civil law and syarak [laws of Islam]”.
This could be seen as a resumption of the 1985-1988 initiative towards the integration of Syariah and Civil Courts.
2007:  Islamic authorities have been observed to have grown more tyrannical in  their enforcement, as evidenced by the recent Revathi Masoosai case  where they forcibly took away her child on the grounds that she was a  Muslim who illegally practised Hinduism, despite her claim that she had  been a practising Hindu since childhood.
A “Building Bridges”  seminar of prominent Muslim and Christian scholars under the auspice of  the Archbishop of Canterbury scheduled for 7-11 May 2007 was abruptly  postponed by officials of the Prime Minister’s Department. No new date  has been yet fixed.
July 17 2007: Deputy PM Najib Abdul Razak  said Malaysia has never been a secular state as the government has  always been driven by the fundamentals of Islam, according to state  Bernama news agency.
These are all history. But when it happened, what did MCA do??? or not do??
ReplyDeleteby
Backfire.